tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post115043973312565226..comments2023-11-05T23:25:31.498+11:00Comments on Wot Is It Good 4: "Al Qaeda is already in possession of WMD"Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1150648243638801382006-06-19T02:30:00.000+10:002006-06-19T02:30:00.000+10:00Read Imperial Hubris by Anonymous, a former CIA An...Read Imperial Hubris by Anonymous, a former CIA Analyst, who says Bin Laden is one of ours. Surprise, surprise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1150501606580872612006-06-17T09:46:00.000+10:002006-06-17T09:46:00.000+10:00Noise - it does sound like he is pushing an agenda...Noise - it does sound like he is pushing an agenda of sorts - but still...<BR/><BR/>as for the rest of your analysis - thats pretty much spot-onlukeryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13280906371216516750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1150487769752524572006-06-17T05:56:00.000+10:002006-06-17T05:56:00.000+10:00If you're running a criminal enterprise, it makes ...If you're running a criminal enterprise, it makes sense to control both sides of the equation.Donhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09909379290909753137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1150484825712008902006-06-17T05:07:00.000+10:002006-06-17T05:07:00.000+10:00Interesting analysis. Though it does sound like Mi...Interesting analysis. Though it does sound like Mir Azaad Khan Baloch is pushing an agenda of sorts. <BR/><BR/>This ties back into AQ Khan scandal...ie...the lack of US pressure to get information and the lack of US cooperation with the Swiss. Which ties into the whole nuclear black market operation. Remember the strange meetings between high ranking US government officials and Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad (ISI chief) right around 9/11? Alexandrovna suggests the date may not be as important as some people suggest but the meetings are noteworthy. What issues were being discussed?<BR/><BR/>Many 9/11 researchers have made links between the CIA and the ISI, suggesting the chain is CIA>ISI>Al Qaeda.<BR/><BR/>Bush Co. supports preemptive wars due to WMD's yet one of the leading allies in the WoT is involved in nuclear proliferation in the region and aids the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Yeah. That makes sense. Rational policy there.<BR/><BR/>Bush Co. knows what they are doing. It would be a mistake to think they are being deceived by Musharraf. The thing is Bush Co.'s agenda is not necessarily in the best interests of the US. Meaning the WoT isn't about keeping Americans safe, rather it is about consolidating power and transferring wealth to Bush Co. friendly corporations. My guess is that "no attacks since 9/11" is being used to justify the police state. Since the Establishment refuses to tell the public the truth about 9/11, Bush Co. is able to sell the BS that the Patriot Act or domestic spying=safety.<BR/><BR/>I don't know how it works. I'm almost to the point (of cynicism) where it wouldn't surprise me if the so called black market is simply a ruse to fool people. Meaning, the black market is official US policy but it wouldn't look good to come out and say so...ie...more people might call BS on the Global War on Terror. As I recall some lightbulbs went off when the Dubai ports story hit the press. The issue with that was the hypocrisy...ie...UAE's links to Al Qaeda. People starting asking the important question, is the WoT BS or not?<BR/><BR/>One thing that supports the theory that the black market=US policy is the lack of accountability. Feith, Perle, Edelman, etc...no prosecutions just occasional FBI rumblings.Trackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18387081215729592952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1150446186736799492006-06-16T18:23:00.000+10:002006-06-16T18:23:00.000+10:00perhaps if we legalize drugs, and outlaw arms we m...perhaps if we legalize drugs, and outlaw arms we might solve some of the problemslukeryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13280906371216516750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1150441194861338932006-06-16T16:59:00.000+10:002006-06-16T16:59:00.000+10:00It just doesn't get any simpler in the Mid-East, d...It just doesn't get any simpler in the Mid-East, does it?<BR/><BR/>1998 does fit the timeframe, though.Donhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09909379290909753137noreply@blogger.com