tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post2038946992812053868..comments2023-11-05T23:25:31.498+11:00Comments on Wot Is It Good 4: "This is not hearsay. These are things that are documented."Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-62193233772151704222007-04-27T06:58:00.000+10:002007-04-27T06:58:00.000+10:00Lukery, you are right, the Matrix is coming unrave...Lukery, you are right, the Matrix is coming unraveled.<BR/><BR/>Kax, it isn't that the press isn't CAPABLE of connecting any dots (though that would likely be true for some of the individual brainless blowdried "journalists"), it is that they are wholly owned by a handful of big conglomerates whose interests are served not by exposing the truth and following leads to where they end up, but by being accessories after the fact in the cover-up. It simply isn't in the media's interests to tell the truth about 9/11. Case in point being CNN's pentagon correspondent Jamie MacEntyre who was on the Pentagon's lawn a few minutes after the "airliner" crashed into the Pentagon and categorically stated that it was apparant that no airliner had crashed there. A day later CNN forced him to retract his statement (though apparantly he didn't HIMSELF retract it, but let CNN retract it for him). For being a good little slave he is now their SENIOR Pentagon Correspondent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1976587809087362182007-04-27T05:33:00.000+10:002007-04-27T05:33:00.000+10:00As I recall the Millenium Celebration in Seattle w...As I recall the Millenium Celebration in Seattle was cancelled precisely because there had been threats of planes flying into their tall building, I forgot the name of it, but the point is, they knew then that it was a potential threat. <BR/><BR/>Further, with $30 billion a year for "Intelligence", it is simply not credible that they would have had no clue whatsoever before 9/11, yet they immediately knew the names of the "highjackers" and that the Bin Laden family needed to be protected and spirited out of the US before being questioned. <BR/><BR/>We really have no free press capable of connecting any dots.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-12432360362255408932007-04-26T22:06:00.000+10:002007-04-26T22:06:00.000+10:00E - regardless - the 'warning' should have made th...E - regardless - the 'warning' should have made the 'missed opportunities' section - there's a crack in the matrix...<BR/><BR/>as yogi berra said, when ya tell the truth, ya dont have to remember anything...lukeryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13280906371216516750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-24511333252873733012007-04-26T06:53:00.000+10:002007-04-26T06:53:00.000+10:00Well, considering that nothing was actually hijack...Well, considering that nothing was actually hijacked on 9/11 and the "nineteen hijackers" were C.I.A. assets whose purpose was to leave a trail of phony "evidence" behind so that in the days after 9/11 the F.B.I. could flesh out the "nineteen hijackers" myth to make it somewhat more believable than it would have been otherwise (with the exception of the several of them who were completely uninvolved victims of passport theft, explaining how they "turned up alive" days later), we can be sure that if Sibel picked up on things that could be considered "missed opportunities" they would be related to this phony trail of "evidence". <BR/><BR/>Here's a related question: Why were the "hijacker pilots" so incompetent at flying Cessnas yet were supposedly able to fly the "hijacked airliners" like pros? Because they didn't have to fly anything on 9/11. Like I said, their purpose wasn't to get on any airplanes, it was just to leave a trail of phony "evidence". Taking rudimentary flying lessons, no matter how pisspoor they did, was enough. Being able to actually fly an airplane wasn't necessary.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-71990207600705180102007-04-25T22:28:00.000+10:002007-04-25T22:28:00.000+10:00here's the thing - if nothing else. there was a sp...here's the thing - if nothing else. there was a specific warning that SIbel is aware of, she reported it to 911COmm, and it didn't appear in 911comm's "missed opportunities" section.<BR/><BR/>something is wrong there with that picture - nobody can disagree with it.lukeryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13280906371216516750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-75582002514256498262007-04-25T15:07:00.000+10:002007-04-25T15:07:00.000+10:00Here's something else to consider, though it doesn...Here's something else to consider, though it doesn't [that I know of] specifically mention flying them into buildings, it's food for thought.<BR/><BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_NorthwoodsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-48305097506294862182007-04-25T13:03:00.000+10:002007-04-25T13:03:00.000+10:00BTW...if anyone want to take up the task of findin...BTW...if anyone want to take up the task of finding that study I seem to remember that the former Senator Gary Hart was one of the members involved in or requesitng the report.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-3327613580688093902007-04-25T13:02:00.000+10:002007-04-25T13:02:00.000+10:00Something that pisses me off...and I lost the link...Something that pisses me off...and I lost the link too...and can't remember the exact title of the study...double damn.<BR/><BR/>Anyway a study was commissioned by congress back in the 90's on attacks to the US and terrorism...I found it on the Libary of Congress web site almost three years ago.<BR/><BR/>In that study it plainly said in black and white that terrorist could and probably would use aircraft as flying bombs to attack major US cities.<BR/><BR/>Now this was commissioned by congress and no one read it and they all claim the idea of a plane as a bomb NEVER EVER occured to them?<BR/><BR/>This has fustrated the hell out of me for a long time because IT IS THERE in plain english in a study commissioned by congress...And no one has seen fit to mention this study..once again, COMMISSIONED BY CONGRESS....???? HUH, Duh?<BR/><BR/>Anyone with some time on their hands can google way back or go to the Library of Congress and look for it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-10804071744438568802007-04-25T07:25:00.000+10:002007-04-25T07:25:00.000+10:00I think it was AG John Ashcroft who refused toi fl...I think it was AG John Ashcroft who refused toi fly commercial planes. Darth always has AF 2 to use.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1485091955851538422007-04-25T00:54:00.000+10:002007-04-25T00:54:00.000+10:00thanks for keeping this visible... we can only hop...thanks for keeping this visible... we can only hope and pray that the truth will out eventually, and, if we keep banging the drum, maybe it will sooner rather than later...profmarcushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07148708132624420673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-33590047780490390132007-04-25T00:49:00.000+10:002007-04-25T00:49:00.000+10:00Wasn't it Cheney who refused to fly in commercial ...Wasn't it Cheney who refused to fly in commercial airplanes starting that summer of 2001?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com