tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post8253586891305984864..comments2023-11-05T23:25:31.498+11:00Comments on Wot Is It Good 4: Most Important Article In The WorldUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-1476967584272356552007-03-18T13:42:00.000+11:002007-03-18T13:42:00.000+11:00thnx cp. great point.fp'dthnx cp. great point.<BR/><BR/>fp'dlukeryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13280906371216516750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5194776.post-84575742315288658122007-03-18T04:52:00.000+11:002007-03-18T04:52:00.000+11:00Another question I'd have in addition to administr...Another question I'd have in addition to administration officials not taking responsibility to verify her status before saying more about her to the press and their responsibility for that, is asking Ms. Plame if there would have been an expectation of not to ECHO earlier damaging infromation and increasing the amount of damage that's been done because she's now "fair game", but doesn't the CIA have the expectation that if an "accidental" disclosure of a covert agaent's status (which is what they seem to be constantly claiming as a defense) was found, that the remaining folks would be expected to help with doing the damage control and at least try to avoid any further disclosures, if not actually help cover it up again?<BR/><BR/>It seems like whether or not this was an accidental disclosure or not, the subsequent "disclosures" can't claim innocence "because the damage had already been done". They should have been trying hard as conscientious officials to repair the mistakes that were made. I've seen no effort to "repair mistakes" and can only conclude that in their view, these disclosures were NOT mistakes at the time they were made. I'd like a congressman to conclude that for us when interviewing her!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com