joevialls: The only people capable of knowing in the early stages that suicide bombers were not used in Madrid, and that 'suicide bombers' could therefore not be mentioned by media at all, for fear of alerting local police to those damning video surveillance tapes at Alcala de Henares, were members of the terrorist group responsible for executing the attack
In turn, the only terrorist group capable of controlling the editorial content of the New York Times is N.O.S. [Novus Ordo Seclorum], which draws its funding from Wall Street, its intelligence from B'nai B'rith, and its depraved Special Forces muscle from Tel Aviv.
In my personal view each of the ten blasts would have required between 40 and 50 pounds of high-order military explosive in the C4/Semtex-H category. Such explosives have a very low specific gravity, meaning they are exceptionally bulky for their given weight. Therefore, this would have required ten [strong] terrorists on the down platform at the same time, each lugging a huge haversack in the middle of the rush hour. Strange then that no eyewitness at Alcala de Henares remembers seeing any of them, for these bulky gentlemen would most certainly have stood out in the crowd, and caused considerable suspicion among the commuters.

Though the western media deliberately led you to believe that these trains were 'just passing through' on continual services, that is not the case. Every one of the four trains were 'first service', i.e. each was making its first run of the day from its respective overnight depot, after being serviced and cleaned.

mred: interestingly - he has the 10 explosions going off at 7.39/40 - ie simultaneously - which was different to those earlier reports that they were spread out over 15mins or woteva which i was trying to work out...