Thursday, March 25, 2004

__________________________________________________
when the buying stops, the killing can too.
wotisitgood4.blogspot.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Luke
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 10:16 PM
To: Michael
Subject: ssrlies


there are more of these ssri stories coming out - first for kids/teens, now more generalised warnings just a few months later. the lies in the studies are criminal. i stopped taking them when the teen stories came out in december - it all sounded a litlle too familiar. ive circled thru 5 different products, with the major effect being the month or two of whiteknuckling every time i switched - after which stabilisation at any level is welcome. im not sure if its related but i switched from functional to nonfunctional when i first started them. altho of course u dont start them unless u are already kooky. some people speak of the fear that happy pills dull the brain - i didnt get the happy bit, but im pretty sure that i also didnt get the dulling bit. so i guess thats a good thing. im not sure that the choices are mutually exclusive, and there are only brief moments were i would choose the happydull option. isnt that stubborn. bluepill. redpill.

the interesting thing is that there are other weird drugs in use that are also under scrutiny. theres an antimalaria drug that the pentagon just stopped using cos of a purported suicide link. there are some suggestions that the current high army suicide rate is related, and suggestions that the fortbragg murdersuicides where the soldiers killed their wives were related.
weve also got the mmr issue and a bunch of other drugs under suspicion. and the cdc is nonspecifically spooky.

we also have some diseases like sars and avian flu and the related media noise - and the idea of medical quarantine being raised a while back, and the odd news that gwb just ordered 75 million anthrax vaccines. the most sinister interpretation is that there is some evil purpose/ingredient for mind control or to wipe out races or woteva. another interpretation is that they just wanna sell some product. if so, they should just make it a placebo - because its becoming increasingly clear that there are adverse side-effects when they try to fuck with biological systems. how significant is the risk they are trying to solve? how effective is the proposed solution? and how many murdered soldiers wives are we prepared to sacrifice to solve that problem?

thats a tuff decision for any society at the best of times - but we make them all the time. the best we can ask for is that the equation is presented honestly. does anyone expect to get that? probably not. does that mean the risk outweighs the reward? maybe. to the extent they lie, then it can be presumed that they arent sure that the public will agree with the objective risk/reward position. therefore it may be the appropriate decision to refrain when the next mass innoculation occurs. assuming it is voluntary.

i dont pretend to have the slitest clues about drugs - but with the demonstrated level of systemic corruption, and the apparent suicide risks with drugs which purport to solve problems as diverse as malaria and depression, and the mass ordering of vaccines and the curiosities of the anthrax errorism et al, and the apparent groundlaying for massjabs, then id be wary of signing up - and its a particularly difficult decision wrt children.

given the lies and the cronyism weve seen, it wouldnt be surprising to see a headline 'vaccine saves* 90% of people from anthrax' (* side effects may include murder# and suicide*), (# u didnt like her that much anyway), (* itll prolly happen to someone else).

from what i gather, anthrax isnt really a mass weapon - its kinda localised, therefore its curious that they have ordered vaccines for 25% of the population. its also somewhat curious that of all the possible diseases to be worried about, anthrax has 25% coverage. id assume that their protection for the 2nd or 3rd (excl s.pox) most likely threat would be say, 1% of the anthrax vaccine cover - which would point to either a rort, or insider knowledge. remember the anthrax attacks were domestic. and by the way, whatever happened to that investigation?

or maybe im just trying to justify my needlephobia so i dont have to get jabbed


No comments: