quick update re my rant yesterday about the australian
guy pleading guilty toi planning to blow up the israeli
embassy for obl, hambali, saddam, darth vadar et al - i
couldnt believe that the story wasnt in "the
australian" - well - the story got a bit curiouser - i
saw a copy of the physical paper - and the story was
the #1 story - will 1/3 page pic (surprisingly, he
looks respectable - not the way they normally demonise
them with mugshot or woteva). so the story is the
number one story in the paper, and not on the website -
all the other stories have shifted up a rung, so that
the number 2 story in the print version 'election
delay' became the number one story on the website and
so on. yesterday the story was in the 'news updates'
section, but it has now disappeared from there...

iraq my brains but cant find any sense at all in any of
it - the story just disappeared from the website. even
im tempted to think that it was an accident!!! the
article is the same - the same 'asio' headline, and no
mention of the guilty plea till para 8. i cant even
begin to hypothesise

2 other snippets from the wizardofoz:

a) a front page terror arrest 6 weeks ago was
undermined yesterday when the judge laughed at them
all.
b) the pm decided that it would be silly risking the
possibility that activist judges might miscontrue and
allow happy gay people to get married so the
prohibition best be enshrined in law. and for a cherry
on top, they banned gay couples from adopting from
overseas (unfortunately the states have jurisdiction
over internal adoptions - for now). in a comforting
show of solidarity, the hitherto anticonsertvative,
antiwar Labour opposition quickly agreed to deny gay
rights.

and in a stunning display of media synchronicity, the
gay marriage story was immediately preceeded by a
weeklong furor over some parliamentarian who took her
bf on a trip 5 (?) years ago as a 'spouse' - it seems
as though she was cutting the definition pretty fine,
altho apparently she specifically checked twice & got
approval at the time. (and for the sweetest rub, the
now-ex-bf was involved in some police investigation 8
years ago.)

so we got a lovely weeklong debate about the definition
of marriage right b4 the nogaymarriage thingy.

and yesterday there was a story about how some 69 (!)
yo guy who'd been fighting a 12yo thai girls
extradition and was found with some child pornography
on his computer (not of her, they were careful to add,
to show that they are fair). im not big on child
pornography as a rule - but i reckon there'd be lots of
people they could get on this charge if they wanted
to... someone once emailed me some porno pix - the
girls looked mebbe 18 - some mighta been 20yos who
looked like they were 18, but others may have been 16
who looked 18... its hard to tell these days...

gays who wanna adopt o/s kids are perverts ya know.
man-on-man. man-on-foreignkid. man-on-dog. mano-a-mano.

i wonder if lyndie england could adopt? actually, that
rite, she is pregnant to one of those many guys she
groupfucked - somehow the bf is confident its his ;-)

_______________________________________________________
You think Arabs are dumb? Try doing long division with
Roman numerals.
wotisitgood4.blogspot.com