dear crooked, i hope that u enjoyed your coffee.

from what i can gather about ww2, its officially true
that the ams knew (in advance):
a) about the pearl harbour attack
b) that the japs were about to surrender *before* am
unleashed her wmds on hirosaki. the 'we had to do it to
end the war' thingy was complete rubbish.

and its also true that many see bush as a hitler-style
fascist... if i were he, id keep my mouth shut about
ww2.

"Quoting from a statement posted on a Qaeda Web site
last year, Mr. Bush said that Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, a
spokesman for the terrorist network, wrote: "We have
the right to kill four million Americans — two
million of them children — and to exile twice as
many and wound and cripple hundreds of thousands.
Furthermore, it is our right to fight them with
chemical and biological weapons."
"No act of America explains terrorist violence, and no
concession of America could appease it," Mr. Bush said.
"The terrorists who attacked our country on Sept. 11,
2001, were not protesting our policies. They were
protesting our existence."

lemme repeat, loud and clear, 32 months and not a
single domestic terrorist attack. apparently the
mandate exists to kill 4million ams, and terrorists are
bizzy taking out soldiers in iraq, 800 dead in a year.
not a single alq terrorist has yet realised that they
could cause most terror by taking an ak47 into times
square and killing 50, which they could do any
lunchtime of the week. and they could do it
simultaneously in 10 cities and really scare the hell
outta people. what are the ams gonna do? attack iraqaghan
again?

i dont think theres a person on the planet who claims
that america isnt immensely vulnerable, or anyone who
pretends that banning knitting needles and shoes from
flights makes them safe.

41.5 helpfully addded "Would the terrorists who
beheaded an American on camera just be quiet, peaceful
citizens if America had not liberated Iraq?" is that
sposed to be a thigh-slapping inside joke???
one answer might be, 'no, in that case, those
terrorists who killed berg would probably still be
rooting for an iraq invasion, just as they were on
91101'


__________
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 21:00:36 -0400, Michael wrote:
Dear Luke,

President Bush says that the attact on the World Trade
Centers is like the attack on Pearl Harbor that
triggered the US’s entry into WWII. The
Japanease apparantly bombed Pearl Harbor, so we
attacked Japan/the Axis. Al-Queda / Suadi natinoals
bombed the WTR, so we attacked Iraq, Al-Queda’s
natural enemy.

So, is the explanation:
the public is exceedingly dull;
there is some connection between Iraq and 911/future
911’s that I missed; or
my coffee is ready?

Thank you!

Crooked in Crooklyn

_______________________________________________________
the sky is falling
wotisitgood4.blogspot.com