Re: Extended Vigilance

um - this is scary/stupid. 'final solution' language is scary. anything tomridge sez is worthy of note cos he is a obviously whore. as far as i can tell, nobody gives a shit about the post-election, pre-inaugration period - altho my recent 'i guarantee kerry definitely wont be pres in feb' thing specifically, intentionally referred to feb to give me some cover for some 'unforeseen' post-election scenarios - which i was kinda wary about. wot else is he talking about?

fark.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 06:31:11 -0400
To: "Luke Ryland"
Subject: Extended Vigilance

> Your thoughts on this? Are they getting cocky and thinking that a
> pre-election attack won't be necessary? ;) But keeping people afraid will
> help expedite the Bush Doctrine's Final Solution...
>
> *************
> "However, echoing a remark made at an April speech in Nevada, Ridge extended
> the amount of time the United States should be extra vigilant against a
> possible al Qaeda attack designed to disrupt the democratic process -- from
> the November 2 Election Day to the presidential inauguration scheduled for
> January 20.
> Ridge also acknowledged that U.S. authorities have "a couple different
> sources" believed to be sharing credible information about the threat.
>
> "You can translate that into anytime between now and the election, now and
> the inaugural -- or any time we conduct business as a democratic society,"
> Ridge said. "Most people think in terms of either the election or the
> inaugural."
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/10/homeland.security.ap/index.html



________________________________________________________________________________
Your More Fears. Your More Fears.
wotisitgood4.blogspot.com