Thursday, October 21, 2004

RE: rented honour

i only get very limited glimpses of jons. damnit. damnit. btw - apparently there were more internet downloads of the jonsxfire interview than actual xfire viewers. an internet first. those damn interneters. sometimes i feel like a freak - ranting about some point, and then i finally get a clip on the jons website saying exactly the same thing - and it makes me feel unalone. and, often, stoopid.

re robertson - i was in the car today and jjj actually played the quote in the hourly 2min news bit. and separately, heres the respone ""Of course the president never made such a comment," said Scott McClellan"

the lesbo thing is one of those things i try to stay away from - like the jone/cheney meeting thing. theres so much energy spent on this shit it drives me mad. its like krove is dragging everyone around by the nose.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam
To:
Subject: RE: rented honour
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:59:55 -0400

>
> Re: the Jons being labeled the campaigners of fear while Cheney talks of
> nuclear winter...as usual, Jon3 (Stewart), juxtaposed the two
> perfectly...(and I still love him)
>
> Re: Pat Robertson and Bush's ignorance. Credit to the Dems for jumping
> on this one - Kerry (camp) asked something to the point of, "So, Mr.
> President, answer one question - Did you say that, or is Pat Robertson
> lying?". But of course, they can't pound it in as well as the Repugs,
> who would have that talking point heard round the world quicker than you
> can say 'lezbo'...
>
> Re: The Boston Redsox come from 0-3 to sweep the Yankees...foreshadowing
> of come from behind upsets from Massachusets...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: luke@lukeryland.com [mailto:luke@lukeryland.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 9:02 PM
> To: michael michael; Paul; Brent Brent; adam
> Subject: rented honour
>
> * "The founder of the U.S. Christian Coalition (patrobertson) said
> Tuesday he told President George W. Bush before the invasion of Iraq
> that he should prepare Americans for the likelihood of casualties, but
> the president told him, "We're not going to have any casualties."" can
> we disqualify him yet? (apparently not: ""Even if he stumbles and messes
> up -- and he's had his share of stumbles and gaffes -- I just think
> God's blessing is on him," Robertson said.") its amazing how leaky the
> whole thing has become in the last month. itll be a an extremely close
> election.
> http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/19/robertson.bush.iraq/index.
> html
>
> * the jons thing is #1 on nyts mostpop list. peeps luv this shit.
> curiously, there are a bunch of bloggers who say that they are bigfans
> of jons but they somehow think that he was outta line. which i really
> dont understand.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/20/arts/television/20watc.html
>
> * stupid safire writes an article called "The Year of Fear" - about how
> the jons are using fear in the campaign - scaring people about
> fluvaccines et al. apparently safire missed cheney yesterday: "...in the
> middle of one of our cities with deadlier weapons than have ever before
> been used against us". the hypocrisy knows no bounds.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/20/opinion/20safi.html
>
> * "If Zarqawi and his associates were not busy fighting American forces
> in Iraq, does Senator Kerry think they would be leading productive and
> peaceful lives? (Laughter.) Clearly, these killers would be plotting and
> acting to murder innocent civilians in free nations, including our own.
> By facing these terrorists far away, our military is making the United
> States of America more secure." go read this (davidcorn is from
> TheNation) http://www.bushlies.ws/2004/10/bush_turns_anot.html (actually
> ive just seen it all on cnn as well - it looks like zarq/ricin is
> becoming an issue. which is funny for two reasons - 1. zarq. 2. ricin.
> my brain is melting)
>
> * cnn just called obl 'the prime suspect in 911' - wow! 'prime
> suspect'??? i thought 'obl did it.' btw - the obl media is getting
> louder. surely they cant bring him out now - altho cnn just made this
> insightful comment 'some say that obl is so entrneched in the mountains
> that us special forces might not be able to go in there and get him out
> again.' (i dunno what it means) (i dont know what anything means)
>
> * "Intelligence officials were convinced that American soldiers would be
> greeted warmly when they pushed into southern Iraq, so a C.I.A.
> operative suggested sneaking hundreds of small American flags into the
> country for grateful Iraqis to wave at their liberators. The agency
> would capture the spectacle on film and beam it throughout the Arab
> world. It would be the ultimate information operation." can we leave
> yet? this is a funny article - for the sheer stupidity/incompetence of
> everything.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/20/international/20war.html?pagewanted=al
> l&position=
>
> * btw - does anyone remember those stories from early after the invasion
> where saddam had built massive underground tunnels under baghdad?
> funny.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________
> Your More Fears. Your More Fears.
> wotisitgood4.blogspot.com
>
>
>



________________________________________________________________________________
Four Score More Beers. Four Score More Beers.
wotisitgood4.blogspot.com

No comments: