Wednesday, January 26, 2005

6 outposts of beer-any

KINDA SLEAZY'S ABOMINATION
* warner: 'when we were deiciding to liberate the people of iraq,
our main reason was wmd'

* apparently rice's 'personal story' is relevant. gonzales' too. they have oversome hurdles like the murderingsniggerer.

* apparently condi is 'qualified' - whether she is a good choice seems hardly relevant.

* shorterfeinstein: 'rice should be nominated cos she thinks that
the israeli/palestinian issue is important'

* drrice likes sports

* drrice is a role model for minorities. like armstrongwilliams.

* im surprised that noone has complained abuot rice stumping for 43
in the final weeks of the elec campaign. its all iraqiraqiraq
(update: jackreed brings up electioneering)

* and noone has mentioned the aug6pdb, or her disgraceful
perfromance at 911comm, or 'noone ever imagined that people would
hijack planes and fly them into buildings'. (update: jackreed and byrd brings up 911)

* woohoo. Cornyn(R) says 'but for the spidey-hole, saddam would have killed us all'

* shorterCornyn(R) 'even those who oppose the war must recognise that a stable iraq is good. therefore, nominate condi. no-one can argue that iraq and the world isnt safer today. saddam tortured people. therefore, nominate condi. partisan politics makes us like our enemies. therefore, nominate condi. partisan poltics is a political insurgency. therefore, nominate condi. the dems tried to raise money, therefore, nominate condi.'

* can robertbyrd save us all? is it possible for *anyone* to vote for the anti.c.rice after watching his speech?


VOTE

* " I'd be delighted to revote Washington's governor's race. But
only if we could also rerun Ohio and Florida."
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/209165_paulloeb.html

* zogby: " The poll finds a higher percentage of Americans saying that they are *ashamed* that Mr. Bush is their president; three-in-ten (31%) Americans now hold that view, as compared to one-in-four (26%) a month ago. " hmm - skyrocketing. up 25% in a month. i wonder what the feb #s will show. im glad that zogby actually has that question in his poll. i wonder how the gallup question reads: "wot do u think about our great president? a)love b) really really like c) really like him but have some minor concerns http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=953

* "Democrats charged in Election Day tire-slashing in Wisconsin" i
was sure that rove did this. praps i was wrong. i cant believe that
dems would be so dumb.
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/24/tires.slashed.ap/index.html


AMDOM
* krug: " If Mr. Greenspan is replaced with someone who looks like a partisan hack, capital will rush to the exits, the dollar will plunge, and interest rates will soar. Yet President Bush, as you may have noticed, only appoints yes-men" http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/25/opinion/25krugman.html?oref=login&oref=login&ex=buzzflash

* "CREW Files Bar Complaint Against Attorney General Nominee Alberto Gonzales - Gonzales misrepresented role in assisting President Bush escape jury duty" CREW may save us. http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/newsrelease.php?view=30

* gorevidal 'the speech was the most unamerican speech' given by a chief executive http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/25/1458238

* "Bush says his pledge to promote liberty is not meant as new policy" - um - as the Note points out - wtf did they think the headlines would be the next day? these people are masters at media. they probably wrote the fucking headlines - alistaircampbell style. "What's going on here? Was the White House trying to assure some nervous dictators that they weren't in the cross-hairs? The elder Bush's appearance was particularly noteworthy because of his long-standing ties with the regime in Saudi Arabia"
http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpina254124763jan25,0,7718233.story?coll=ny-editorials-headlines

* "For his own sake and ours, Bush and his advisers should not be making it easier for adversaries and skeptical allies to dismiss freedom as an advertising slogan used to justify whatever foreign policy the administration decides to pursue. All presidents need a dose of realism, but surely this president doesn't want it said that his willingness to stand up for freedom depends on what the definition of "freedom" is." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33958-2005Jan24.html

* a beheading in the works. an am. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20050125/ts_nm/iraq_dc

* happy oztralia day
________________________________________________________________________________
war makes me mad, sad, bad. tsunamis makes me sad.
wotisitgood4.blogspot.com

No comments: