bolton is 31 at tradesports, which seems remarkably high. how are they gonna get around their probs in seven days? it sure looks like quite a struggle. (btw - i have zero clue why tradesports doesnt open up another contract with a sep30 date. are they stupid? or a recess contract? surely there more interest in bolton now than ever.)
perhaps the answer is buried in this logic:
as an aside:
steve clemons and laura rozen were both running stories about the boltons tradesports contracts "tanking". i left a comment at TWN explaining that the apparent tanking was largely a function of the fact that the contract has a june30 expiration date, and i exchanged emails with laura explaining the same.
i signed my emails to laura as "lukery", so she thanked me publicly on her site thusly: "Thanks to reader LL for the explanation of the scheme." - which is pretty funny. LukeryLand: fun for all the family.
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment