The article was triggered by the latest subpoena :
"Sources familiar with the Justice Department-led probe say that one area of interest to investigators is $15,600 that the U.S. Family Network paid in 1999 to Liberty Consulting, a firm run by Lisa Rudy, the wife of Tony Rudy, who was a deputy chief of staff to DeLay before becoming a lobbying colleague of Abramoff's."Fair enough.
The article continues:
"The Washington Post reported late last year that most of the network's $2.5 million in funding over a five-year period came from Abramoff clients. For instance, the Mississippi Band of Choctaws and a small group of textile executives from the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands together donated a total of $750,000 to the U.S. Family Network in the late 1990s. Another $1 million donation was made in 1998 by an anonymous donor through a London law firm that may have been used as a conduit by two Russian oil executives."Fair enough, as it goes, but they somehow forgot to mention that the rest of the funds came from the NRCC!
" The Network made headlines as the recipient of the largest single donation the National Republican Congressional Caucus ever made, $500,000. The check was cut by Virginia Congressman and DeLay crony Tom Davis, NRCC chair, but was never approved by the executive committee." (link)That's where a big scandal lies, undoubtedly, as i mentioned the other day.
NJ continues:
"The network, which had a tiny staff and did little public advocacy, also paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to Buckham and the Alexander Strategy Group, which for a period of time was based in the same townhouse. Christine DeLay was a consultant to the ASG lobby shop for three years and earned $115,000 in fees for work related to charities. Investigators have been seeking to find out whether Abramoff clients helped to underwrite her work."I don't know when the 'Christine did work related to charities' meme got (very effectively) planted - but it's untrue. I categorically debunked this nonsense here.
(apart from that, the NJ article is worth a read)
No comments:
Post a Comment