Hadley's name, again

* DoD & State are refusing to fill Conyers' FOIA wrt Iraq becuase it would be too expensive. BradBlog has the details, exclusively. Nice work brad.

* regarding the timing of the latest CIA purge, and the 'coincidental' timing with the Condi/AIPAC news, Don in the comments points to this JTA article from late March:

"Ellis said he would rule later on the defense's slate of subpoenas of top Bush administration officials, including Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state; Stephen Hadley, the national security adviser; and David Satterfield, the deputy ambassador in Baghdad. He suggested that he was likely to approve the subpoena of Satterfield, one of the government officials identified in the indictment as leaking information to Rosen."

Don:

"They had to have known Condi was one of the government officials in question, knowing it would get out eventually. They've certainly had enough time to have a distraction plan in place for when the story finally broke.

And look: there's Hadley's name, again, Imagine that..."

(thnx don) I sooo wouldn't wanna be Hadley right now. Rove is probably trying to bribe fitz as we speak so that Hadley gets indicted the same day, if not before.