Friday, July 21, 2006

sending a message to the terrorists

* glenn:
"The extremism and dangerous rhetoric on which the Bush movement so heavily relies is quite blatant and easy to see. The more it is documented and highlighted, the more it will seep into the narratives promoted by the national media. The reason the Bush presidency has become so extreme is because those who compose it and support it, in large part, are themselves extremists. Far greater media examination of that dynamic is warranted, and one thing which blogs can do is force those issues to be examined."

* digby:
"The neocons have achieved the opposite of what they set out to achieve. Instead of an empire their failed experiment is turning the American public isolationist. There was a time not so long ago when it would have been assumed that the US would play an active role in solving any serious foreign policy crisis. After the cock-ups of the last few years, people are no longer so sanguine that we will actually help the situation rather than make it worse.

As we survey the situation tonight, it seems as if the Bush administration is living in an alternate universe. In a week, after Israel has "defanged" Hezbollah, Condi is slated to fly in and sing kumbaaya. Either that or we are going to officially begin WWIII. Or Armageddon is imminent --- oh happy day, the Bridegroom is on his way. These are what the big thinkers on the right are offering us right now. Of those choices the Bush administration has, so far, opted for the first scenario. They are going to wait until the Israelis shoot all the bad guys and then they'll ride in and hold a town meeting."

* Sen voinovich in wapo via dkos:
"Should the president choose to renominate (Bolton), I cannot imagine a worse message to send to the terrorists -- and to other nations deciding whether to engage in this effort -- than to drag out a possible renomination process or even replace the person our president has entrusted to lead our nation at the United Nations at a time when we are working on these historic objectives.
For me or my colleagues in the Senate to now question a possible renomination would jeopardize our influence in the United Nations and encourage those who oppose the United States to make Bolton the issue, thereby undermining our policies and agenda."
add your own wtf? in the comments.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

You clearly lack the broader perspective. Bolton's the man!

lukery said...

i clearly lack something. but you are correct - by all acounts, bolton is a man.

damien said...

I'm playing with you Luke (got to change the bait).

lukery said...

mmmm. man-bait. plato's retreat. yum.

Kathleen said...

Voinovich, R.Ohio, home of Coingate.

The SFRC should refuse to hold hearings unless the NSA submits the dox the committee requested last time Bolton was being not confirmed.

The SFRC should defend its important role in the nomination process by not permitting Bush to circumvent the Constitution by abusing the recess appointment provision.

lukery said...

kathleen - i'm not confident