Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Don't Resign, Hastert. yet.

* glenn:
"If Drudge (who last night was blaming the 16-year-old pages for Foley's conduct) and The Washington Times are now on the "Fire Hastert" train, it's hard to see him lasting more than a week. I actually think the best thing that could happen for Republicans would be for Hastert to resign sooner rather than later, although they then would be faced with the very serious problem that the next in line, Rep. Boehner, is quite implicated in all of this also. It seems like a safe bet that while the top level of the GOP House leadership is focused on saving themselves, the next level down is focused on which new jobs will be up for grabs."
Hang on Denny!

* washTimes:
Resign, Mr. Speaker
[]
House Speaker Dennis Hastert must do the only right thing, and resign his speakership at once. Either he was grossly negligent for not taking the red flags fully into account and ordering a swift investigation, for not even remembering the order of events leading up to last week's revelations -- or he deliberately looked the other way in hopes that a brewing scandal would simply blow away. He gave phony answers Friday to the old and ever-relevant questions of what did he know and when did he know it? Mr. Hastert has forfeited the confidence of the public and his party, and he cannot preside over the necessary coming investigation, an investigation that must examine his own inept performance.

A special, one-day congressional session should elect a successor. We nominate Rep. Henry Hyde, also of Illinois, the chairman of the House International Relations Committee whose approaching retirement ensures that he has no dog in this fight. He has a long and principled career, and is respected on both sides of the aisle. Mr. Hyde would preside over the remaining three months of the 109th Congress in a manner best suited for a full and exhaustive investigation until a new speaker for the 110th Congress is elected in January, who can assume responsibility for the investigation."

2 comments:

Miguel said...

What I want to know is, does George W. send instant messages? Or is he the high moral leader we've been led to believe?

Man, I'm having a blast on the right-wing blogs today!

Although a word of caution, does a potential war with Iran become more likely (a GOP distraction).

lukery said...

imagine bush and karl texting all day with new fart jokes.

i would say that a war is more likely. (perhaps they asked Nth Korea to steup up the rhetoric today with a promise that they'd give them more nukes or something)