* from the AP: "The defense was told that the White House had recently located and turned over about 250 pages of e-mails from the vice president's office. Fitzgerald, in a letter last month to the defense, had cautioned Libby's lawyers that some e-mails might be missing because the White House's archiving system had failed."
leopold's title said "White House 'Discovers' 250 Emails Related to Plame Leak", altho his article says "250 pages of emails." Is that one page per email? probably (?)
* via Laura: "The number of Iraqi army battalions judged capable of fighting the insurgency without U.S. help has slipped from one to zero since September, Pentagon officials said Friday." (link)
You'll remember that in September they reported that the number had fallen from three, to one. (in fact, from three to zero and back up to one)
* " An examination of Palm Beach County's electronic voting machine records from the 2004 election found possible tampering and tens of thousands of malfunctions and errors, a watchdog group said Thursday."(link)
* reddhedd: "In this case, though, the first amendment arguments are going to be fairly robust from the news organizations involved, I'm sure, considering the high profile names involved. I'd guess that Team Libby is banking on this -- but I must say that Judge Walton's framework on subpoenas and motions is an aggressive one, and that bodes well for him not taking kindly to attempts to stonewall and delay. The deadline on this was set for April."
that's a glimmer of hope that Reggie isnt in the tank
* jane: "According to the AP, Walton indicated that since the SAO has not been charged they have the right to privacy. But on Countdown tonight David Schuster seemed to be saying that to reveal the identity of that individual was getting to the "overall strategy" of Fitzgerald's investigation."
* jane: "How does the WaPo manage to print an entire article on the topic without mentioning the 250 pages of newly released emails from the Veep's office? I don't know but by jingo they do."
Sunday, February 26, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment