Saturday, May 13, 2006

Rod Barton, Australian Whistleblower

Following up from our recent investigation into the scenario where Stephen Hatfill may have been creating mobile weapons labs for dumping in the Iraqi desert as "proof" of saddam's evilness, simon sent through this article about Aussie weapons inspector, ISG member and whistleblower, Rod Barton. (thnx simon)

-----------

Words of Mass Deception

Rod Barton blew the whistle on Australian, US and British lies about Iraq's hidden weapons cache. And the Australian Government has made sure he pays a high price for his stand. Hamish McDonald reports.

FOR a decade Rod Barton knew the special loneliness of a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq, teasing out clues from one of the world's nastiest regimes about biological weapons of unspeakable effect.

[]

Now Barton is suffering a new kind of isolation after turning whistleblower on how the American, British and Australian leaders distorted intelligence to justify their invasion of Iraq and how they condone the torture of Iraqi prisoners.

Back home in Canberra, Barton is ostracised and unemployed in his old intelligence profession, to which at 58 and still formidably incisive, he could still contribute a lot.

[]

Barton made waves and is being punished. In March 2004, he and another Australian, the Foreign Affairs disarmament specialist John Gee, resigned in protest from the Iraq Survey Group, set up by the US Central Intelligence Agency to find the Iraqi nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that had been the excuse for invasion. The CIA was refusing to face the truth that Saddam's weapons had been destroyed in 1991.

In February last year, Barton went public on ABC television. Now he has written a devastating book about it, The Weapons Detective (Black Inc. Agenda, $29.95). His security clearances withdrawn, Barton knows he will not be getting any more contracts from his old employer, the Defence Intelligence Organisation, which he had joined as a young microbiologist in 1972.

Old colleagues at the intelligence organisation have been warned not to have contact with him, not even social meetings. In one act of spectacular pettiness, at the insistence of the Prime Minister's staff, Barton and Gee were dropped from the guest list for last year's 20th anniversary meeting in Sydney of the Australia Group, a forum of intelligence specialists from 38 countries on chemical and biological weapons, which the two had helped set up in 1985.

"I knew that blowing the whistle would bring some penalties, but not to this extent," Barton says. "Was I that much a threat to the security of Australia when - what was it I spoke out about: prisoner abuse?"

In his new book, Barton lays out in shocking clarity that the reason for the Iraq invasion cited by America's George Bush, Britain's Tony Blair and Australia's John Howard was false.

Blair and Howard knew it was false, Barton says. Bush may not have known, because his intelligence agencies were reporting what he wanted to hear.

When shown the Australian intelligence assessment, Howard even asked: "Is that all there is?"

Barton saw both the British and Australian intelligence assessments about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction before the March 2003 invasion. Saddam had at most a few chemical and biological weapons left over from the 1980s, and no means of delivering them. There was no evidence he had resumed WMD programs after UN weapons inspectors were kicked out in 1998.

It was no grounds for war, so the intelligence was doctored - notably in the British "dossier" published on the orders of the British Joint Intelligence Committee chairman, John Scarlett, which claimed Saddam had chemical and biological weapons deployable "within 45 minutes of an order to use them".

Howard cited the British dossier in assuring the Australian public and Parliament his Government had "compelling evidence" that Saddam possessed these weapons. "Is it a lie or is it a spin or what?" Barton said. "But it's certainly misleading the people."

The liars and spin doctors have prospered, the whistleblowers have been shafted. Barton's former UN colleague and friend, the British defence scientist David Kelly, killed himself in July 2003 after being outed for telling a BBC journalist how Scarlett had "sexed up" the Iraq intelligence. Scarlett was still "sexing up" the post-invasion intelligence, Barton shows, but has been made chief of Britain's famous spy service, MI6. Barton shakes his head: "John Scarlett should not head any intelligence organisation." In the CIA, the medals, cash bonuses and promotions go to agents who tell their chiefs about new weapons threats, not the ones who caution the evidence is weak.

[]

One bit of unwelcome reporting by Barton, to Australia's Defence Department, was the first indication of the special "purgatory" centre being run by US Special Forces at Camp Nama, next to Baghdad Airport.

"High value" prisoners selected for disorientation before interrogation have a hessian bag put over their heads for up to 72 hours, and are deprived of food, water and sleep, made to stand up for long periods, exposed to intense heat or cold, and bashed at random intervals. Unlike the improvised brutality by US soldiers exposed at the Abu Ghraib prison, all this is sanctioned by the US Administration, which claims it does not amount to torture. "That's what makes it so much worse," Barton says.

"We went to war on WMD, which is withdrawn now. And now the casus belli is to bring democracy and human rights - yet we, the coalition, are detaining people without trial, and we the coalition are using torture techniques," Barton says. "As a member of the coalition we have a responsibility. We, the Australians, should be telling our American colleagues: This is just not acceptable; if you want us as a member of the coalition, to continue our presence there, then we ask you to stop this practice.

"But of course this Government doesn't want to upset the Americans, so we won't do that."

-------

Give me an F-R-E-E-D-O-M

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Since we are talikng about Australia it's worth commmenting on an editorial (May 11, 2006) in The Australian which basically said that Australian Guantanamo detainee David Hicks should either be tried or released. [Hicks has recently won a victory in the UK courts affirming his right to seek UK citizenship which should the see him freed].

This from the editorial:"This is not to say Mr Hicks is not a nasty piece of work – he is. He took up arms first with Islamic fighters in Kosovo..."

In regard to the whole business of Kosovo, the official Dutch Srebrenica massacre inquiry that led to the resignation of the Dutch government found that there was a secret alliance between the Pentagon and radical Islamist groups that assisted the Bosnian muslims. Weapons were smuggled though Croatia in violation of the UN arms embargo, along with radical Islamist fighters.

And from The Guardian (22 April 2002): "... Initially aircraft from Iran Air were used, but as the volume increased they were joined by a mysterious fleet of black C-130 Hercules aircraft. The report stresses that the US was 'very closely involved' in the airlift.... the Pentagon's own secret service was the hidden force behind these operations."

Whatever the alleged crimes of David Hicks, the US certainly won't be charging him over Kosovo.

I've written to The Australian to see if they can clarify their concept of fair reporting on documented historical events, but it's a no-go. The Australian people, like the rest of the world, are to be force fed the crap that the US has only ever been an innocent bystander.

We live a good life in Australia. We should at least be able to get our arse in gear enough to understand what's really going on in the world.

Anonymous said...

There's also been the bit of monty python lunacy of our media a few days ago reporting on an agreement with the US govt that would see Hicks serve any sentence here in Australia. Talk about putting the cart before the horse! The guys hasn't been charged yet; the court, it's jurisdiction, it's legality and its methods are all under challenge and in defiance of US and international law; and it looks like Hicks will get UK citizenship and freedom anyway. But,in the unlikely event that he gets past all that crap and gets convicted, he'll do time in Australia!

Straight out of Monty fucking Python!

Anonymous said...

And the Australian Government has made sure he pays a high price for his stand...

Barton is ostracised and unemployed in his old intelligence profession...

Barton made waves and is being punished...

Old colleagues at the intelligence organisation have been warned not to have contact with him, not even social meetings. In one act of spectacular pettiness...


Disgusting. Dr. Gee won't go public with his story and the top British bod has classified his own resignation letter. Default proof that the case for war was cooked up and that efforts (by J. Scarlett) were made to try to retrospectively maintain the false case against Iraq. The sad thing is that the instigators of Arab terror attacks will also read this (not necessarily here) and it will only reinforce their hatred for the effects of American foreign policy. I'm not saying that it will lead to an Australian 9-11. But it might.

lukery said...

"The sad thing is that the instigators of Arab terror attacks will also read this (not necessarily here)..."

i wouldnt be so sure - this blog is actually really popular amongst the terrorist-chattering-classes

Anonymous said...

lukery,

i wouldnt be so sure -

Oh well, maybe they'll get to read a bit more about the mobile weapons labs from us then:

(Nicked from Cooperative Research dot Org under Creative Commons Licence)

July 2003

Hamish Killip, a British army officer and biological weapons expert working with the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group, inspects the alleged mobile biological weapons labs that were found by US forces in April (see May 9, 2003) and May (see April 19, 2003) and is immediately skeptical. “The equipment was singularly inappropriate,” he later recalls. “We were in hysterics over this. You’d have better luck putting a couple of dust bins on the back of the truck and brewing it in there.” The trailers were clearly built for the purpose of producing hydrogen. [Los Angeles Times, 12/20/2005]

People and organizations involved: Hamish Killip

March 2004

Hamish Killip, a British army officer and biological weapons expert, resigns from the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group, in protest of the CIA’s refusal to acknowledge that the alleged mobile biological weapons labs found by US forces in April (see May 9, 2003) and May (see April 19, 2003) of 2003 were in fact designed to produce hydrogen, not biological weapon agents. Two other members of the Iraq Survey Group—Rod Barton, an Australian intelligence officer and another bio-weapons expert—also quit this month for similar reasons. [Los Angeles Times, 12/20/2005; Age (Melbourne), 4/26/2005]

People and organizations involved: Hamish Killip, Rod Barton