Sunday, October 01, 2006

My Pet Goat moment had a simple explanation

* atrios:
"I've long believed that the My Pet Goat moment had a simple explanation. For perhaps the first time in his life George Bush, just for a moment, felt a tiny bit of personal responsibility for something that went horribly wrong under his watch. It was not a nice feeling. They were warned, strongly, and they did nothing. Absolutely nothing."
I'd be more convinced if he had anything but his poker face going. Perhaps he should have slapped his forehead with a D'oh!

* nyt on woodward:
"Were the war in Iraq not a real war that has resulted in more than 2,700 American military casualties and more than 56,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, the picture of the Bush administration that emerges from this book might resemble a farce. It’s like something out of “The Daily Show” or a “Saturday Night Live” sketch, with Freudian Bush family dramas and high-school-like rivalries between cabinet members who refuse to look at one another at meetings being played out on the world stage."

* Ron at RS:
"According to a new book written by Washington Post investigative reporter Bob Woodward, two months before the September 11 attacks, then National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice gave the "brush-off" to an "impending terrorist attack" warning by former C.I.A. director George J. Tenet and his counterterrorism coordinator."
* wapo on woodward/911:
"Tenet had been losing sleep over the recent intelligence he'd seen. There was no conclusive, smoking-gun intelligence, but there was such a huge volume of data that an intelligence officer's instinct strongly suggested that something was coming. He and Black hoped to convey the depth of their anxiety and get Rice to kick-start the government into immediate action.

He did not know when, where or how, but Tenet felt there was too much noise in the intelligence systems. Two weeks earlier, he had told Richard A. Clarke, the National Security Council's counterterrorism director: "It's my sixth sense, but I feel it coming. This is going to be the big one."

But Tenet had been having difficulty getting traction on an immediate bin Laden action plan, in part because Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld had questioned all the National Security Agency intercepts and other intelligence. Could all this be a grand deception? Rumsfeld had asked. Perhaps it was a plan to measure U.S. reactions and defenses.
The July 10 meeting between Tenet, Black and Rice went unmentioned in the various reports of investigations into the Sept. 11 attacks, but it stood out in the minds of Tenet and Black as the starkest warning they had given the White House on bin Laden and al-Qaeda. Though the investigators had access to all the paperwork on the meeting, Black felt there were things the commissions wanted to know about and things they didn't want to know about.
Black later said, "The only thing we didn't do was pull the trigger to the gun we were holding to (Rice's) head.""
* wapo A1:
Headline: "New Book Fuels Election Year Debate Over Bush, Rumsfeld"

"New revelations that White House aides tried twice in the past two years to persuade President Bush to fire Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld fueled a caustic election-season debate yesterday over the president's wartime leadership and underscored divisions within his administration.
The book reports that then-White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. twice suggested that Bush fire Rumsfeld and replace him with former secretary of state James A. Baker III, first after the November 2004 election and again around Thanksgiving 2005. Card had the support of then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell and his successor, Condoleezza Rice, as well as national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley and senior White House adviser Michael J. Gerson, according to the book.

Even first lady Laura Bush reportedly told Card that she agreed Rumsfeld had become a liability for her husband, although she noted that the president did not agree. "I don't know why he's not upset with this," she told Card, according to the book. But Vice President Cheney and senior Bush adviser Karl Rove argued against dumping Rumsfeld, and Bush agreed."
Wapo notes:
"Correction to This Article: An earlier edition of this article appeared with a different headline."

GoogleNews tells us that the headline was previously:
"Anti-Rumsfeld Effort Detailed In Book Denied by White House"
The print edition headline is:
WhiteHouse Disputes Book's Report of Anti-Rumsfeld Moves."


rimone said...

one of the few times i totally disagree w/atrios. AFAIC, that look on his stupid face said 'holy shit--they actually did it.'

Black later said, "The only thing we didn't do was pull the trigger to the gun we were holding to (Rice's) head."

pity, that.

lukery said...

come now - you know that i dont agree with murder unless it is conducted on un-named foreigners. murdering one specific person is bad. we can all agree on that. mudering anonymous foreigners is fun, right? they deserve it.

rimone said...

fuck 'anonymous foreigners,' rice is brownish black!