it's a list of quotes supportive of Walton on the DoJ website (Office of Legal Policy) - they were able to find four supportive quotes, including one from 1989, and one from 1991. (lol).
here's the 1989 quote by Judge Nan R. Huhn and Judge Bruce D. Beaudin (as quoted by David S. Broder,Washington Post Staff Writer)
"Colleagues on the bench like Judge Nan R. Huhn talk about the sacrifice Walton is making in leaving the court, giving up eight years of retirement credits and what many in Superior Court regard as virtually a "sure shot" at eventual elevation to chief judge. He is taking a $9,000-a-year pay cut to join an agency with no history, little statutory power, no political security and the burden of public responsibility for what well could prove to be mission impossible. He's doing it, said Judge Bruce D. Beaudin, ‘because as a black man, he's desperate to save a generation of black men. My guess is he can't face himself if he doesn't try.’" (Referring to Judge Walton leaving the bench when President Bush (41) appointed him to be the Associate Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy) The Washington Post, May 6, 1989."Given what we know about the War on Drugs (*cough*), i'm tempted to rewrite that last sentence - perhaps:
"My guess is he can't face himself if he doesn't try them all"or
"My guess is he can't face himself if he doesn't fry them all"but that would just be snarky.
Incidentally,
"Judge Walton previously served as an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia from 1981 to 1989 and 1991 to 2001, having been appointed to that position by Presidents Ronald Reagan in 1981 and George H. W. Bush in 1991." (link)in other words, the purported idealism, attributed to him magically by guesswork in the wapo article - "desperate to save a generation of black men" - lasted approximately 12 months.
Judge Walton, mammon is on the phone, putting you through...
Speaking of mammon, Walton is the only judge to have his financial records completely redacted - I'm not sure how many judges have any redactions.
Reader John also notes that Reagan established the Office of National Drug Control Policy inside exec. branch via executive order in 1988, and also that the current drug tsar, John Walters "Wants jail for users and opposes medicinal use of cannabis. Son of General Vernon Walter, Nixon's deputy chief of the CIA" (link) - which is great, given today's news about the War on Drugs (*cough*)
that link i just provided is from an article in the Guardian in 2001 called "Iran-contra men return to power - Bush appointments tainted by Reagan-era scandal" - and goes on to describe "Four of a Kind": Elliott Abrams , John Negroponte, Otto Reich and John Walters. Little did the journo know at the time that Abrams would be deeply involved in outing a CIA agent, Negroponte would be king of iraq and then in charge of the CIA plus everything else, and that Reich would be doing whatever the hell he is doing now, after spending time as ambassador to mexico (or whatever) and in charge of bush's election campaign in florida (or whatever it was) - and that Ledeen and Ghorbanifar are still peddling secrets and disinformation and starting new wars.
3 comments:
Lukery--
O/T, but has Sibel ever made any indications one way or another as to what Armitage was up to at State?
Because we're pretty sure over at TNH that Armitage is Mr. X based on the redaction analysis, but we cannot figure out how he would be so sloppy to accidentally leak info that Plame was CIA not once, but twice, and one of those time to a guy who's known for his big mouth and arrogance (Novak). Which leads one to believe that Armitage was in on this thing from the get go. And presumably that he and Grossman were pretty tight with whatever Sibel was monitoring.
I have a theory that Plame's "official cover" (as per Larry Johnson's CNN appearance in August 2005, I think) was with the Bureau of Nonproliferation, possibly in the export controls section. I'm not going to say anything more, but go google EXBS and see what you get with regards to meetings and such.
As such, she might have been onto the cabal as Sibel hints, and Armitage would be in a position to know that she was doing double-duty for State and CIA, and thus be able to effectively neutralize her.
Problem is, I just don't see Armitage as being really tight with OVP and Libby, especially when his boss was so at odds with the OSP folks and the neocons at Defense. And when their own intelligence arm (INR) was pretty much openly at war with CIA. He'd be betraying a lot of people under him by siding with the neocons on this.
Unless Armitage was the designated "good cop" in the scheme, and his purpose was to encourage his boss to oppose the neocons to create a "sham" war of Defense vs. State and CIA vs. INR, while secretly working behind Powell's back to further the neocons' designs. You know, muddy up the waters, make it look to the powers that be in the WH that there really WAS a significant spat in the intel community on Iraq, and that anything coming out of State was just Powell being Powell again. That would be a pretty sneaky strategy.
link
gday viget - yeah, i've been following that conversation over at EW's place. you guys all do amazing work.
i'm not familiar with EXBS - i'll look into it.
sibel hasn't mentioned armitage AFAIK - but she does point to State as being more corrupt than anywhere else.
I don't really have any evidence, but i've always thought that the interagency warfare stuff was largely over-blown - and it kinda leads us down the wrong path, looking for good guys and bad guys and so on. This seems particularly true when it comes to Powell and Armitage. For reasons that i'm not sure, Powell is presumed to be a good guy, and armitage was Powell's deputy, and therefore armitage is presumed to be a good guy. Similarly, sibel does point to scowcroft as being involved,
Armitage seems to have a reasonable neocon pedigree - he was a PNAC signatory, and he is involved in some of the regions that SIbel points to - specifically azerbaijan, which is neocon central - see here for more (esp the comments)
sneaky strategies indeed - but i'm not really sure how all the nuts and bolts fit together.
cheers
Post a Comment