* in the comments:
I don't have much of a sense of May either. If i'm not mistaken he popped his head up again recently - perhaps to rail against Armitage or Fitzgerald or some such. EW? anyone?
update: ew in the comments:
" 3 data points, though I'll have to come back tomorrow to say more.
First, May also wrote a story the week of the leak. Though he didn't get the leak.
Second, May is supposed to have been interviewed by the FBI (no doubt for his September claims), but Fitz didn't include him in the list of the 5 journalists who had received a leak. So either May was lying in his September column (my guess) or he was lying in his testimony.
Third, Waas has done a lot of reporting on the way that Republican operatives were involved in the leak in Fall 2003. I've always taken that to include May."