in any case, if you google ""john roberts" gay" - my post is number one. woohoo. google has some curious habits... maybe google is gay. (theres more here)
now im being attacked by wingnuttia for being a gay-basher. is that the funniest shit you've ever heard? i knew that we were living an orwellian nightmare of up-is-downism, but i think we've just broken new ground.
some wingnut wrote an entire post 'disassembling' my "hate-filled diatribe" and damned me to hell for "pure, asphixiating bile". sweet. go read it. he accused me of moonbattery :-)
the writer asks: "So, what if Roberts is gay? Exactly. SO WHAT?" firstly, i hope that all of wingnuttia takes up this response. that would be brillo. secondly, here's the answer to that question: if Roberts is gay, then Dobson and the rest of the Focus of the Fetus folks will go batshit crazy(er). it'd be so much fun to watch. imagine how pretzellian their 'logic' would get defending a homosexualist so that they could abort abortion.
apart from the fun simply watching dobson et al, imagine their enormous stick whacking the repug senators who are trying to support the president. that'd be fun *and* effective. with any luck, we could send all the fundie folks back to their political torpor for a generation and no amount of schiavo republicanism will waken them. i 'pray' for the day i hear the dobson crew call the repugs "democrats lite" - that would be so sweet.
i even got involved in a discussion in the comments section of the post - where i was told to shut the fuck up cos im not even american. ouch. i was taken to task by the blogger for saying that roberts "arguably puts his faith above the constitution". arthur makes the case as well as i could, and he's already done it. so read here.
arthur points to this article by conservative Jonathan Turley (law professor at George Washington University) with this highlight: "Roberts was asked by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) what he would do if the law required a ruling that his church considers immoral... (Roberts) answered after a long pause that he would probably have to recuse himself."
read that again: "his *church* considers immoral" - roberts' crazy fucking cult thinks everything is immoral (including man-dog sex. bastard.) - they even think that lying is immoral (well, at least its a sin or something) - although that apparently didnt stop roberts from lying about his federalist society steering committee. maybe thats the 11th commandment - thou shalt not 'forget'.
speaking of lying, how about this from democracynow:
"At one of their recent conferences at Yale Law School, which was opened to anyone who wanted to attend, they actually chuckled about the fact that originally they were going to name it the Anti-Federalist Society, but it didn't sound very good, so they called it the Federalist Society. The point here is the -- this organization of extremist lawyers really has no principles about what they call themselves, whether they remember if they were members of the Steering Committee or not. The point is whatever sells and moves their agenda forward, they're prepared to use. And this debate over Federalist or the Anti-Federalist is really illustrative of the underlying cynicism and ruthlessness of this organization."if roberts actually believes in hell *and* he swears on his bible that he'll recuse himself from any case that involves stuff that his cult believes is immoral, then ill start raising money for him and stop making jokes about him dressing in black dresses - lest i "harrass (family man) Roberts and his family for the next 20 years or anything" - heaven fucking forbid. this 'family man' "put his family life on hold because he wanted to focus on his career". batshit nearly-pres-candidate santorum virutally said that adoption is bad on the daily show. contraception is bad. abortion is bad. adoption is bad. divorce is bad.
oops - segue - back to roberts. if he promises to recuse himself on immoral stuff, then ill vote for him. ill raise money for him. ill even suck his dick. he'll be the unbusiest guy on the planet. with any luck, scotus will be split 4/4 on *everything*. no harm, no foul. i wont even complain about roberts going male-bonding with a gun with scalia and cheney on af2 - and because roberts is so gay, he'll probably come home walking like a duck. quack quack. my only hope is that im privvy to the conversation where scalia and roberts discuss the doctrine:
roberts: i feel bad - the church says i shouldnt cheat on my wife
scalia: it depends on your definition of 'cheat'
roberts: well - you know - having sex with someone else
scalia: nah - read the bible closely - it just says that you shouldnt have sex with a person who is the same sex as your spouse
roberts: well - you are just being a strict constructionalist
scalia: ooh - say that again. PLEASE
roberts: a STRICT constructionalist - lol
scalia: louder!
roberts: you know, i *served under* bush1
scalia: and so it will continue. lie down.
roberts: do u have a condom?
scalia: panzapope hates condoms
roberts: no no no. he hates contraception
scalia: yeah - condoms are contraceptive devices
roberts: anton - im not gonna get pregnant - so its not a contraceptive
scalia: well - condoms are dual purpose- like those wmd tube thingies. we have to be consistent.
roberts: youve been reading too much of bareback sullivan
scalia: PLEASE!!!
roberts: please anton - my wife will kill me. and she's against the death penalty
scalia: "The choice for a judge who believes the death penalty to be immoral is resignation"
roberts: im not even confirmed yet
scalia: i know - lie down.
roberts: promise me yuo wont make LAWRENCE V. TEXAS retrospective.
scalia: quack quack.
scalia: i said "quack quack" bitch
you can guess the rest.
heres the thing - my post about frenchy fag thespian roberts was satire. was it "gay-baiting"? i dont know - and i dont fucking care. if gay-baiting would help, then i'd gaybait - if we wanted to get into dirty tricks, id call roberts a mother-murderer if it helped. and if he isnt a mother-murderer yet, he will be when he slaughters abortion rights. i wanna be the one to post a gruesome picture of a botched backalley abortion to his (potemkin) family fridge so he can see it every morning - right next to them 10 commando thingies that roy moore loves so much.
it totally blows my mind that redheads would even dare throw the 'gaybaiting' label around - are they really all fucking braindead? as i said, i dont know if im guilty of gaybaiting or not - but one thing is for sure - if i was, it certainly wasnt to turn bluefolk against roberts - it was to turn the repugs against their own 'made man'. thats ju-jitsu.
is it fair? i dont give a fuck. karl rove turned kerry into a french-looker, cleland into a mono-limbed traitor, mccain into a lunatic, richards into a pussylicker and 100,000 iraqis into wormfood. how dare i gaybait? FUCK.RIGHT.OFF.
as rumsfeld likes to say - the gloves are off. what he probably meant to say is that its ok if we rape little iraqi boys - and its okay to do it without the love glove - bareback is so much more fun.
signorile says that roberts is a homosexualist, always repentant ten minutes hence - 'what will the priest say?'
if the bush administration wants to try to nominate cleanskins, then their clean skin is 'fair game'
and if they want someone who hasnt left his dirty fingerprints anywhere, then i hope those fingerprints are on a transvestites blue dress. that would be so much fun.
john roberts is really gay
______
-----
or see here called "Destroy Machine" for more serious comments on roberts
---
theres more here called "is John Roberts gay or just experimenting" or here "John Roberts is really gay"
_____
update here called "John Roberts still gay"
-----
and a peripheral update here called "John Roberts - as gay as gannon"
___
or there might be more at my homepage
No comments:
Post a Comment